The wholeheartedness equation

I have a confession to make. I still haven’t delivered the revised manuscript for my fourth book, but in spare moments I have begun work on my fifth, working title Wholehearted: Inside the Deliberately Adaptive Organisation, business agility at every scale. There’s nothing like writing to make you revisit things that you thought were settled, and here I am looking again at wholehearted, for five years now the title and theme of Agendashift’s mission. Perhaps you haven’t thought of it in quite these terms before, but if you want your organisation to grow in wholeheartedness, then we’re here to help.

Tentatively (as questions, not prescriptions), let’s take Lean’s¹ “eliminate impediments” and apply it not to flow, but to wholeheartedness. Viewed from two sides (as a system, if you like):

If we eliminate impediments to wholeness, does that improve “heartedness”? If, for example, we simplify lines of communication or address issues of trust or coherence, do we make it more likely that people will be more engaged, acting with purpose and energy?

And going the other way, if we eliminate impediments to “heartedness”, does that improve wholeness? If, for example, we can relieve overburden, might the capacity freed thereby be used to tackle deeper, more structural issues?

I think it’s fair to say that there’s a limit to how much progress you can make on one side of the wholeheartedness equation before the other side begins to dominate. If it’s wholeness you seek, you need heartedness also, and vice versa.

Note, however, the “more likely” and “might” in my examples. Be careful of men bearing virtuous circles! If there is a virtuous circle here, we must (as I have written before) ask what mechanisms sustain it. That’s not delivered by wholehearted on its own as described here, but we do have that covered. Keeping wholehearted doing what it does best, representing an ideal to pursue:

But today’s exercise: if you want your organisation to grow in wholeheartedness, which of its two sides most need your attention? Wholeness or heartedness? And when you do that, then what happens?

¹Further to that Lean inspiration, Philippe Guenet tells me that there are encouraging resonances with The Flow System (Brian Rivera, John W. Turner, and Nigel Thurlow). I haven’t read that yet, but now I think about it, I’m not surprised. It’s on my list.

Related:


Upcoming events

February

March

*TTT/F and (where shown) LIKE events include free one-year membership of the Leading with Outcomes Authorised Facilitator programme, upgradeable to Authorised Trainer at any time. Both of those include access to the video-based Leading with Outcomes training and the full range of Agendashift assessment tools.


Leading with Outcomes from the Agendashift Academy
“Leadership and strategy in the transforming organisation”

Leading with Outcomes is our modular curriculum in leadership and organisation development. Each module is available as self-paced online training or as private, instructor-led training (online or in-person). Certificates of completion or participation according to format. Its modules in the recommended order:

  1. Foundation module:
  2. Inside-out Strategy:
  3. Adaptive Organisation:
  4. Outside-in Strategy:

Individual subscriptions from £24.50 £18.40 per month after a 7-day free trial, with discounts available for employees and employers in the government, healthcare, education, and non-profit sectors. For bulk subscriptions, ask for our Agendashift for Business brochure.

To deliver Leading with Outcomes training or workshops yourself, see our Authorised Trainer and Authorised Facilitator programmes. See our events calendar for Train-the-Trainer / Facilitator (TTT/F) and Leading in a Transforming Organisation trainings.


Agendashift™: Serving the transforming organisation
Links: Home | Subscribe | Events | Media | Contact | Mike

Agendashift  Academy: Leading with Outcomes | Trainer and Facilitator Programmes | Store

At every scope and scale, developing strategy together, pursuing strategy together, outcomes before solutions, working backwards (“right to left”) from key moments of impact and learning.

Developing & pursuing strategy in the language of outcomes